Money & Corp · Cour de cassation
28d
AI illustrationDid a bank's info slip-up cost this business fair damages?
Your callDid the court wrongly decide damages without hearing both sides first?
TL;DR
- 1A business sued a bank for not providing crucial loan information, claiming it led to financial loss.
- 2The bank was ordered to pay damages, but the court did this based on 'loss of chance' without hearing both sides.
- 3The bank challenged this unique ruling, arguing it wasn't fair to decide that way without input.




