Did a bank's info slip-up cost this business fair damages?

AI breakdown

• A business sued a bank for failing to provide important loan information, which allegedly led to its financial loss.
• The court decided that the bank owed damages based on a 'loss of chance' without properly hearing both sides.
• The Cour de cassation ruled that this was incorrect and annulled the decision because the parties weren't heard on this point.

Outcome

Cassation partielle

Taken from the judgment's conclusion. Check the full text for the exact order.