TL;DR

1. 1A man applied to stay in France, but the police prefect denied his request and ordered him to leave the country.
2. 2The Paris administrative court later ruled the prefect's decision should be canceled because he didn't properly consider the man's personal situation.
3. 3Now, the police prefect is appealing that ruling, arguing the court erred in its judgment.

TL;DR

1. 1An architecture firm requested a tax credit refund of €47,084 for research expenses in 2018.
2. 2The administrative court rejected their request, saying their projects didn’t meet eligibility requirements.
3. 3Now the firm is appealing, arguing that their research efforts were valid and should qualify for the refund.

TL;DR

1. 1A teacher applied to take a judges' recruitment exam after meeting the requirements for years of service.
2. 2She was denied because the minister said she hadn't served four years as a civil servant, missing important experience.
3. 3The teacher claims her time as an intern should count, and she wants the court to allow her to take the test.