Can a cruise company skip taxes if guests don't steer the ship?

Money & Corp · Cour de cassation

17d

Illustration: rows of empty seats in front of a large window with a parked plane in an airport gate

Your callCan a cruise company skip taxes if guests don't steer the ship?

TL;DR

1Blue Sky Cruises ran a ship called L'albatros for leisure trips, but faced heavy taxes on fuel.
2 argued the ship was for pleasure, not commercial use, so it didn't qualify for fuel tax exemption.
3Blue Sky Cruises said it offered full service trips, meaning the company, not the guests, controlled the ship.

More cases to judge

Everyday Law · Cour de cassation

16d

Today's case 1/3

A restaurant owner and an insurance representative discuss coverage for pandemic losses. — Is the insurance company justified in denying pandemic loss coverage?

Your callDoes the policy cover losses from the COVID-19 pandemic?

TL;DR

1A restaurant in Paris bought insurance to cover business losses under a 'Complément plus' policy.
2During COVID-19 lockdowns, it tried to claim losses for being forced to close, but the insurer said a pandemic wasn't covered.
3The restaurant sued, arguing the exclusion was too vague and shouldn't apply.

Everyday Law · Conseil d'État

Today's case 2/3

Illustration: a ball resting on the center line of the field in an empty stadium at dusk

Your callShould the court pause the new certification rule for instructors?

TL;DR

1A sports instructor group challenges a new rule letting untested candidates certify as instructors.
2They argue it risks safety, as some may lack skills for extreme sports like kitesurfing.
3The court must decide if suspending the rule is urgent and legally justified.

Everyday Law · Conseil d'État

Today's case 3/3

Illustration: a small model house next to a calculator and a pile of coins in a kitchen table

Your callShould the supermarket and gas station be taxed as one establishment?

TL;DR

1A supermarket and a gas station in Ligné, France, are taxed for their commercial spaces separately. The tax authority saw them as one business due to their close operation under the same name.
2The supermarket challenged the tax court's decision, arguing they are located over a kilometer apart and are not part of the same commercial zone.
3The supermarket wants its tax bills reduced, claiming the tax court made a mistake in treating the two locations as one establishment.

Everyday Law · Conseil d'État

Your callShould the company be allowed to reduce its property tax payments?

TL;DR

1The company Galaxie is fighting to lower its property tax amount for its buildings in Mandres-les-Roses from 2020 to 2024, claiming the tax assessment was wrong.
2A rejected Galaxie's request, stating they followed proper procedures during the case, specifically that the public rapporteur didn't need to present their conclusions.
3Galaxie argues that the court had an irregular process, claiming it didn't address key evidence, and now wants the court to cancel the lower ruling.

Money & Corp · Cour de cassation

16d

Illustration: a large umbrella-shaped sculpture over an empty reception desk in a corporate office lobby

Your callDid the appeals court properly assess the insurance claims for fire damages?

TL;DR

1An insurance company, Axa France, is in a dispute over who should pay for damages caused by a fire at a company building.
2The fire in September 2013 severely damaged a building owned by a business insured by Axa, leading to expensive claims of around 6 million euros.
3Axa argues the previous court decision wrongly placed too much blame on them and fails to consider all evidence of liability for the damages.

More cases to judge

Everyday Law · Cour de cassation

16d

Today's case 1/3

Your callDoes the policy cover losses from the COVID-19 pandemic?

TL;DR

1A restaurant in Paris bought insurance to cover business losses under a 'Complément plus' policy.
2During COVID-19 lockdowns, it tried to claim losses for being forced to close, but the insurer said a pandemic wasn't covered.
3The restaurant sued, arguing the exclusion was too vague and shouldn't apply.

Everyday Law · Conseil d'État

Today's case 2/3

Your callShould the court pause the new certification rule for instructors?

TL;DR

1A sports instructor group challenges a new rule letting untested candidates certify as instructors.
2They argue it risks safety, as some may lack skills for extreme sports like kitesurfing.
3The court must decide if suspending the rule is urgent and legally justified.

Everyday Law · Conseil d'État

Today's case 3/3

Your callShould the supermarket and gas station be taxed as one establishment?

TL;DR

1A supermarket and a gas station in Ligné, France, are taxed for their commercial spaces separately. The tax authority saw them as one business due to their close operation under the same name.
2The supermarket challenged the tax court's decision, arguing they are located over a kilometer apart and are not part of the same commercial zone.
3The supermarket wants its tax bills reduced, claiming the tax court made a mistake in treating the two locations as one establishment.

Everyday Law · Conseil d'État

Your callShould the company be allowed to reduce its property tax payments?

TL;DR

1The company Galaxie is fighting to lower its property tax amount for its buildings in Mandres-les-Roses from 2020 to 2024, claiming the tax assessment was wrong.
2A rejected Galaxie's request, stating they followed proper procedures during the case, specifically that the public rapporteur didn't need to present their conclusions.
3Galaxie argues that the court had an irregular process, claiming it didn't address key evidence, and now wants the court to cancel the lower ruling.

Money & Corp · Cour de cassation

16d

Your callDid the appeals court properly assess the insurance claims for fire damages?

TL;DR

1An insurance company, Axa France, is in a dispute over who should pay for damages caused by a fire at a company building.
2The fire in September 2013 severely damaged a building owned by a business insured by Axa, leading to expensive claims of around 6 million euros.
3Axa argues the previous court decision wrongly placed too much blame on them and fails to consider all evidence of liability for the damages.