TL;DR

1. 1An Indian company and a Korean company had a deal to work together on water treatment projects.
2. 2They disagreed on business issues, leading the Indian firm to end the agreement and demand money.
3. 3The companies now argue over whether their disputes should be decided by an arbitrator in India or Korea.

TL;DR

1. 1Sudhir was a lecturer at a college that operated without government funding.
2. 2After being terminated, he challenged the decision and won compensation from the college.
3. 3The state objects to absorbing him as the High Court ordered, arguing it only applies to funded colleges.

TL;DR

1. 1A woman had a deal to sell land in Karnataka, but the buyers didn't pay in time.
2. 2She then sold the land to someone else, leading the original buyers to file both a lawsuit and criminal charges.
3. 3The state quashed charges against the landowners but kept them against the woman, who says she was just representing the owners.

TL;DR

1. 1A graduate in civil engineering landed a government job but hasn't been paid due to unverified degree credentials.
2. 2His university is accused of selling degrees, leading to a freeze on all document verification.
3. 3The graduate says the university's errors caused this issue, and he seeks court help to fix it.

TL;DR

1. 1Sanjay Sureka was accused of using shell companies to launder ₹6210.72 crore.
2. 2He was denied bail by Calcutta High Court and has been jailed for 20 months.
3. 3Sureka argues his long detention breaches his rights, as the trial could take years.