TL;DR

1. 1A man was convicted of raping and murdering a minor and then hiding the crime.
2. 2The prosecution used circumstantial evidence like witness statements and DNA reports.
3. 3The man argues the evidence does not clearly show his guilt, pointing to gaps in the case.

TL;DR

1. 1A man says his property was sold without his permission, claiming a General Power of Attorney he signed was used improperly.
2. 2He argues the sale deed is void because it lacked proper authority, but the lower courts said he waited too long to complain.
3. 3Now, he wants his case to go back for more evidence, saying the earlier dismissal didn't consider all the facts.

TL;DR

1. 1A company wants to build a medical waste treatment plant in Uttar Pradesh and has already received approvals.
2. 2Another company claims the first company broke land-use rules, specifically saying they’ve misrepresented their site size and failed to meet requirements.
3. 3The court must now decide if the approvals given to the medical waste facility were legal, which impacts the plant's future.