Back to feed Read the full judgment
IndiaCriminal
Sainaba vs State Of Kerala
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- Sep 30, 2026
- Citation
- 2026 INSC 1069
- Judges
- Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Manmohan
AI breakdown
- The case is about a bounced cheque for ₹3,00,000 sent to repay a loan. The court decided the notice delivered to the man's mother counts as proper service. This follows past rulings that validate notices correctly addressed and posted.
Outcome
Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of.
Taken from the judgment's conclusion. Check the full text for the exact order.
Parties
Applicant
Sainaba
Respondent
State Of Kerala
Judgment text (excerpt)
Sainaba vs State Of Kerala on 30 September, 2026
2026 INSC 1069
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.________ OF 2026
(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO.17180 OF 2025)
SAINABA ….APPELLANT
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA & ANR. ....RESPONDENTS
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 29th
July 2025 passed by the Kerala High Court in Crl. R.P. No. 865 of 2023, whereby
the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and the Appellate Court convicting and
sentencing respondent No.2 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 (“the Act, 1881”), were set aside on the ground of non-compliance of proviso
(b) to Section 138 of the Act, 1881 inasmuch as the statutory demand notice had
not been served upon respondent No.2, but was served upon the mother of
respondent No.2.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
KRITIKA TIWARI
3. A perusal of the paper book shows that notice in the present matter was
Date: 2026.09.30
16:57:47 IST
Reason:
issued on 10th November 2025 and the same was served upon respondent No.2 on
SLP(Crl.) No.17180 of 2025 Page 1 of 16
11th December 2025. Despite due service of notice, there is no appearance on
behalf of respondent No.2. Consequently, this Court had no option but to proceed
with hearing of the matter.
BRIEF FACTS
4. In the complaint under Section 138 of the Act 1881,…

Source: Indian Kanoon (indiankanoon.org). Indian court judgments are public records; the summary and translations are AI-generated.