Serious Crime · California Court of Appeal
Sep 30, 2026 · A172959 · Appeal
TL;DR
- 1X.G. pleaded no contest to grand theft but wasn't the only one involved.
- 2He was ordered to pay the full amount of restitution to the victim.
- 3He argues restitution should be based on his share of blame.
Appeal
Lower-court ruling unlocks after you vote
Should the court consider X.G.'s share of blame before setting full restitution?
