TL;DR

1. 1An Indian company and a Korean company had a deal to work together on water treatment projects.
2. 2They disagreed on business issues, leading the Indian firm to end the agreement and demand money.
3. 3The companies now argue over whether their disputes should be decided by an arbitrator in India or Korea.

TL;DR

1. 1Sudhir was a lecturer at a college that operated without government funding.
2. 2After being terminated, he challenged the decision and won compensation from the college.
3. 3The state objects to absorbing him as the High Court ordered, arguing it only applies to funded colleges.

TL;DR

1. 1Students at Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College were promised a stable fee structure for their B.Tech courses.
2. 2In October 2023, the state allowed colleges to increase fees unexpectedly, affecting ongoing students.
3. 3The college raised fees by 37.5%, leading students to sue, claiming their initial fee agreement should hold.

TL;DR

1. 1A graduate in civil engineering landed a government job but hasn't been paid due to unverified degree credentials.
2. 2His university is accused of selling degrees, leading to a freeze on all document verification.
3. 3The graduate says the university's errors caused this issue, and he seeks court help to fix it.

TL;DR

1. 1A charity trust in Hyderabad claims it owns a property listed in a dispute about a sale agreement executed in 2001.
2. 2The original court decree favored another party, giving them the right to take possession, but the charity believes it has a valid claim based on historical documents.
3. 3The charity wants the Supreme Court to send the case back for a new hearing, arguing that key evidence about property ownership wasn't properly considered.