Judicial Insight
Back to feed
Appeal deadline extendedCriminalCourt of AppealsAppeal

People v. Rosario

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided
Sep 30, 2026
Docket
2026-04522
Judges
Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 05559
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary

AI breakdown

Analyzed Oct 2, 2026

Where this case stands

  1. The opinion doesn't say what the decided.

  2. This decision · Appeal

    Appeal deadline extended

TL;DR

  1. 1The defendant missed the deadline to file an appeal in his case.
  2. 2The court decided to allow him to file the appeal late.
  3. 3He showed sufficient reasons for the delay, granting him a chance to appeal.

Key issues

  1. 1

    Should the defendant be allowed to file a late appeal?

    Holding · Yes, the court found that the defendant showed reasons that justify allowing a late appeal.

Why it matters

This decision could affect others who miss appeal deadlines, offering a chance for reconsideration if justified.

The AI breakdown is a reading aid, not legal advice. Always check the opinion for the exact wording.

If you were the judge?

Can the defendant file a late appeal in his case?

  1. 1The defendant missed the deadline to appeal his case.
  2. 2He applied for permission to file the appeal late.
  3. 3The court must decide if he can go ahead now.

Should the defendant be allowed to file a late appeal?

Be the first juror

Parties

  • Prosecution

    People

  • Appellee

    Rosario

Roles are inferred from the case caption.

Opinion of the court
People v Rosario 2026 NY Slip Op 05559 September 30, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Antonio Rosario, appellant. Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department Decided on September 30, 2026 2026-04522, (Ind. No. 71640/22) Angela G. Iannacci, J.P. Helen Voutsinas Donna-Marie E. Golia James P. McCormack, JJ. Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Sarah E. Corsico of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Kaley Hanenkrat of counsel), for respondent. [*1] DECISION & ORDER Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis seeking leave to file a late notice of appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 16, 2024. ORDERED that the application is granted, and the defendant's application is deemed to be a timely notice of appeal. The appellant established his entitlement to the relief requested (see People v Syville, 15 NY3d 391). IANNACCI, J.P., VOUTSINAS, GOLIA and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur. ENTER: Darrell M. Joseph Clerk of the Court
View on CourtListener