Judicial Insight
Back to feed
(the petition is dismissed)CivilCourt of AppealsAppeal

Matter of Perry v. Monaco

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided
Oct 15, 2026
Docket
Appeal No. 7251|Case No. 2025-01936|
Judges
Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 06031
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary

AI breakdown

Analyzed Oct 16, 2026

Where this case stands

  1. The opinion doesn't say what the decided.

  2. This decision · Appeal

    (the petition is dismissed)

TL;DR

  1. 1A man asked the court if he can proceed with a case against the District Attorney.
  2. 2The court decided he cannot move forward with his case.
  3. 3The key reason was that his application was denied under .

Key issues

  1. 1

    Can the man proceed with his case against the District Attorney?

    Holding · The court ruled that the application was denied and the case .

Why it matters

This decision affects the man's ability to challenge the actions of the District Attorney in court.

The AI breakdown is a reading aid, not legal advice. Always check the opinion for the exact wording.

If you were the judge?

A man wants to take the District Attorney to court. Should he be allowed to?

  1. 1A man filed a request to take the District Attorney to court, claiming the DA acted improperly in a previous case.
  2. 2His request was rejected by a lower court, which didn't find enough legal grounds to support his claims.
  3. 3Now, he's appealing the decision, asking a higher court to allow him to pursue his case against the District Attorney.

Should the court let the man take his case forward against the District Attorney?

Vote to earn 10 Verdict Points

Parties

  • Appellant

    Matter of Perry

  • Appellee

    Monaco

Roles are inferred from the case caption.

Opinion of the court
Matter of Perry v Monaco 2026 NY Slip Op 06031 October 15, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. In the Matter of William Perry, Petitioner, v Mark A. Monaco etc., et al., Respondents. Decided and Entered: October 15, 2026 Appeal No. 7251|Case No. 2025-01936| Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Pitt-Burke, , JJ. William Perry, petitioner pro se. Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Franklin R. Guenthner of counsel), for The District Attorney, respondent. [*1] The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. ENTERED: October 15, 2026
View on CourtListener