Judicial Insight
Back to feed
Appeal granted to higher courtCivilCourt of AppealsAppeal

Mosey v. Office of Ct. Admin.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided
Oct 2, 2026
Docket
MOTION NO. (194/26) CA 25-00553.
Judges
Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 05699
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary

AI breakdown

Analyzed Oct 4, 2026

Where this case stands

  1. The opinion doesn't say what the decided.

  2. This decision · Appeal

    Appeal granted to higher court

TL;DR

  1. 1The worker claims the Office of Court Administration made mistakes affecting his job.
  2. 2The court decided that he can appeal to the higher court.
  3. 3The key reason is that the worker deserves a chance to have his case reviewed further.

Key issues

  1. 1

    Can the appellant appeal the decision to the higher court?

    Holding · The court ruled that the worker has the right to appeal, allowing the case to proceed.

Why it matters

This decision affects the worker's ability to challenge decisions that impact his job.

The AI breakdown is a reading aid, not legal advice. Always check the opinion for the exact wording.

If you were the judge?

A worker takes on the Office of Court Administration in court

  1. 1A worker claims the Office of Court Administration made decisions affecting his job wrongfully.
  2. 2He argues that he deserves a chance to appeal those decisions to a higher court.
  3. 3The Office of Court Administration wants to block his appeal, saying he shouldn’t be allowed to take it further.

Can the worker appeal this decision to a higher court?

Parties

  • Appellant

    Mosey

  • Appellee

    Office of Ct. Admin.

Roles are inferred from the case caption.

Opinion of the court
Mosey v Office of Ct. Admin. 2026 NY Slip Op 05699 October 2, 2026 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. HON. ACEA M. MOSEY, PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Decided on October 2, 2026 MOTION NO. (194/26) CA 25-00553. Present: Lindley, J.P., Greenwood, Delconte, And Skinner, JJ. (Filed Oct. 2, 2026.) [*1] MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted.
View on CourtListener