Back to feedAnalyzed Oct 3, 2026 View on CourtListener
(the ex-husband wins)CivilCourt of AppealsAppeal
Baylies v. Willis
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Decided
- Oct 2, 2026
- Docket
- 676 CA 25-00646
- Judges
- Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 05660
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary
AI breakdown
Where this case stands
Supreme Court, Onondaga County: denied the plaintiff's motion for , granted the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment, and the amended complaint.
This decision · Appeal
(the ex-husband wins)
TL;DR
- 1A woman challenged a court decision in her fight with her ex-husband, claiming her case was wrongly .
- 2The court decided to keep the dismissal in place, siding with her ex-husband.
- 3They found no reason to reopen the case and kept the original decision.
Key issues
- 1
Should the complaint against her ex-husband be ?
Holding · The court the complaint, agreeing with the ex-husband that it should not proceed.
Why it matters
This affects post-divorce legal battles and how courts handle disputes over dismissing claims.
If you were the judge?
Ex-wife's complaint gets tossed. Was it fair?
- 1A woman wanted a quick win in her court fight with her ex-husband.
- 2The court chose her ex instead, dismissing her claims.
- 3She thinks the court made a mistake and wants to overturn it.
Should the court have thrown out her complaint against her ex-husband?
Parties
Appellant
Baylies
Appellee
Willis
Roles are inferred from the case caption.
Opinion of the court
Baylies v Willis
2026 NY Slip Op 05660
October 2, 2026
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
JOLINDA BAYLIES, FORMERLY KNOWN AS JOLINDA L. WILLIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
CHARLES L. WILLIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Decided on October 2, 2026
676 CA 25-00646
Present: Montour, J.P., Ogden, Greenwood, Nowak, And Skinner, JJ.
ALDERMAN & ALDERMAN, PLLC, SYRACUSE (RICHARD B. ALDERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
CHARLES L. WILLIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Robert E. Antonacci, II, J.), entered March 19, 2025, in a post-matrimonial action. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment, granted the cross-motion of defendant for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint.
[*1]
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: October 2, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court