Judicial Insight
Back to feed
(complaint proceeds against the Cains)CivilCourt of AppealsAppeal

Bankers Healthcare Group, LLC v. ALC Legacy, LLC

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided
Oct 2, 2026
Docket
698 CA 25-01247
Judges
Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 05665
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary

AI breakdown

Analyzed Oct 3, 2026

Where this case stands

  1. Supreme Court: denied the motion to dismiss the complaint against Carlos and Shannon Cain.

  2. This decision · Appeal

    (complaint proceeds against the Cains)

TL;DR

  1. 1A loan company, Bankers Healthcare Group, sued ALC Legacy and its associates for breach of contract.
  2. 2The New York ruled that the complaint against Carlos and Shannon Cain should not be .
  3. 3The decision was based on reasons stated in the 's decision, which were not detailed here.

Key issues

  1. 1

    Should the complaint against Carlos and Shannon Cain be ?

    Holding · No, the court the decision to deny the dismissal of the complaint, following the 's reasoning.

Why it matters

This case affects how contract disputes are handled, confirming that complaints can continue if initial grounds are adequate.

The AI breakdown is a reading aid, not legal advice. Always check the opinion for the exact wording.

If you were the judge?

A contract dispute pits a loan company against two individuals. Who's right?

  1. 1A loan company claims a business didn't follow their contract.
  2. 2Two people involved say the case against them should be dropped.
  3. 3The court must decide if the complaint stands or falls.

Can Carlos and Shannon Cain get the complaint in the contract case?

Parties

  • Appellant

    Bankers Healthcare Group, LLC

  • Appellee

    ALC Legacy, LLC

Roles are inferred from the case caption.

Opinion of the court
Bankers Healthcare Group, LLC v ALC Legacy, LLC 2026 NY Slip Op 05665 October 2, 2026 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. BANKERS HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLC, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v ALC LEGACY, LLC, DEFENDANT, CARLOS CAIN AND SHANNON CAIN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department Decided on October 2, 2026 698 CA 25-01247 Present: Whalen, P.J., Lindley, Bannister, Delconte, And Hannah, JJ. ANTHONY J. PIETRAFESA, SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. BYRNE, COSTELLO & PICKARD P.C., SYRACUSE (JORDAN R. PAVLUS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. Appeal from a decision and order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Robert E. Antonacci, II, J.), entered June 5, 2025, in a breach of contract action. The decision and order, among other things, denied the motion of defendants Carlos Cain and Shannon Cain to dismiss the complaint. [*1] It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision and order at Supreme Court. Entered: October 2, 2026 Ann Dillon Flynn Clerk of the Court
View on CourtListener