Judicial Insight
Back to feed
Appeal deniedCivilCourt of AppealsOther proceeding

Doe v. Moran

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided
Oct 2, 2026
Docket
MOTION NO. (91/26) CA 25-00596.
Judges
Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 05694
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary

AI breakdown

Analyzed Oct 3, 2026

Where this case stands

  1. Appellate Division: denied the motion for reargument or leave to appeal.

  2. This decision · Other proceeding

    Appeal denied

TL;DR

  1. 1A woman who lost her case asked for another chance to argue or to appeal to a higher court.
  2. 2The court decided not to allow another argument or an appeal to a higher court.
  3. 3The judges found no reason to reopen the case or allow the appeal.

Key issues

  1. 1

    Should the court allow a reargument?

    Holding · No, the court decided there was no basis to allow a reargument.

  2. 2

    Should the case be allowed to appeal to a higher court?

    Holding · No, the court found no reason to permit an appeal to the higher court.

Why it matters

This decision affects the woman and others who may want to challenge court decisions without strong legal grounds.

The AI breakdown is a reading aid, not legal advice. Always check the opinion for the exact wording.

If you were the judge?

Can they get one more chance in court?

  1. 1A woman lost her case and wants another try in court.
  2. 2She asked the judges to look at her case again or let her appeal higher.
  3. 3The court has to decide if there's a good reason for a second look.

Should the court give her another chance to appeal?

Parties

  • Appellant

    Doe

  • Appellee

    Moran

Roles are inferred from the case caption.

Opinion of the court
Doe v Moran 2026 NY Slip Op 05694 October 2, 2026 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. JANE DOE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v THOMAS E. MORAN, COUNTY OF LIVINGSTON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Decided on October 2, 2026 MOTION NO. (91/26) CA 25-00596. Present: Lindley, J.P., Curran, Ogden, Greenwood, And Hannah, JJ. (Filed Oct. 2, 2026.) [*1] MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
View on CourtListener