Back to feedAnalyzed Oct 3, 2026 View on CourtListener
Resignation acceptedCivilCourt of AppealsAppeal
Matter of Adkins
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Decided
- Oct 2, 2026
- Docket
- 701 CA 25-01750
- Judges
- Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 05680
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary
AI breakdown
Where this case stands
The opinion doesn't say what the decided.
This decision · Appeal
Resignation accepted
TL;DR
- 1An attorney applied to resign from practicing law for personal reasons.
- 2The court accepted his resignation and removed his name from the roll of attorneys.
- 3The court found that the resignation was for non-disciplinary reasons.
Key issues
- 1
Should the attorney be allowed to resign from the bar for personal reasons?
Holding · The court accepted the resignation after confirming it was for non-disciplinary reasons.
Why it matters
This decision allows attorneys to leave their profession voluntarily, even if not facing misconduct charges.
If you were the judge?
Attorney wants to leave the profession. Should he be allowed?
- 1An attorney asked to resign from practicing law.
- 2He claims his decision is for personal, non-disciplinary reasons.
- 3The court must decide if the resignation can be allowed.
Should the attorney be allowed to resign for personal reasons?
Opinion of the court
Matter of Adkins
2026 NY Slip Op 05680
October 2, 2026
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
MATTER OF JOHN FIREY ADKINS, AN ATTORNEY, RESIGNOR.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Decided on October 2, 2026
701 CA 25-01750
Present: Curran, J.P., Bannister, Montour, Greenwood, And Hannah, JJ. (Filed Sept. 14, 2026.)
[*1]
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Application to resign for non-disciplinary reasons accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys.