Back to feed Read the full judgment
IndiaCivil
Modern Asset vs Knk Constructions Private Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- Oct 8, 2026
- Citation
- 2026 INSC 1103
- Judges
- J.B. Pardiwala, K. Vinod Chandran
AI breakdown
- A construction company involved in a project was paid only a fraction of its claim after insolvency proceedings.
- The Supreme Court of India allowed the arbitration to continue despite the debt plan, giving the firm a chance to claim more.
- The court decided this because the arbitration agreement survives the insolvency resolution, allowing further claims.
Outcome
The appeal stands disposed of with the above modification.
Taken from the judgment's conclusion. Check the full text for the exact order.
Parties
Applicant
Modern Asset
Respondent
Knk Constructions Private Limited
Judgment text (excerpt)
Modern Asset vs Knk Constructions Private Limited on 8 October, 2026
2026 INSC 1103
Non-Reportable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVILL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Appeal No………...of 2026
[@ Special Leave Petition (C) No.25068 of 2026]
Modern Asset
…. Appellant
Versus
KNK Construction Private Limited.
…. Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
Leave granted.
2. The instant appeal raises an interesting question, apropos
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC for short) as to
whether an Operational Creditor (OC) who suffered a major
haircut in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) can
be proceeded against by the Successful Resolution Applicant
(SRA) for pre-CIRP dues due from the OC, to the entity which had
fallen into CIRP.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
CHANDRESH
Date: 2026.10.08
3. On background facts, we have to notice that the appellant
19:00:23 IST
Reason:
and the respondent entered into a contract for civil and structural
Page 1 of 24
CA@SLP (C) No. 25068 of 2026
work of construction of an office building by an agreement dated
09.07.2018, in which Clause 19.13 provided for arbitration with
respect to disputes or differences in relation to or arising out of or
touching the said contract; the total contract amount of which was
Rs.133.68 Crores. The appellant paid the mobilisation advance
and the r…

Source: Indian Kanoon (indiankanoon.org). Indian court judgments are public records; the summary and translations are AI-generated.