Back to feedAnalyzed Oct 4, 2026 View on CourtListener
(the man's appeal is dismissed)CivilCourt of AppealsAppeal
Matter of Pine v. Kirk
- Court
- Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Decided
- Oct 2, 2026
- Docket
- 606 CAF 25-00384
- Judges
- Not listed
Cited as2026 NY Slip Op 05635
Detailed analysis & 3-line summary
AI breakdown
Where this case stands
Family Court: the custody petition.
This decision · Appeal
(the man's appeal is dismissed)
TL;DR
- 1The man appealed a Family Court decision that his custody petition.
- 2The the appeal without costs.
- 3They found no merit in the man's arguments against the dismissal.
Key issues
- 1
Did the Family Court properly dismiss the petition?
Holding · Yes, the agreed that the dismissal was correct due to lack of merit.
Why it matters
This decision affects the custody rights of parents involved and reinforces the standards for petitioning the court.
If you were the judge?
Man appeals Family Court's decision to dismiss his petition against the mother of his child
- 1A man filed a petition seeking a change in custody arrangements for his child in Family Court.
- 2The Family Court dismissed the petition, stating it didn’t provide enough reasons or evidence to support his claims.
- 3The man is now appealing the court's decision, hoping to get the chance to prove he deserves a different custody arrangement.
Did the Family Court make the right call by dismissing the man's petition?
Parties
Appellant
Matter of Pine
Appellee
Kirk
Roles are inferred from the case caption.
Opinion of the court
Matter of Pine v Kirk
2026 NY Slip Op 05635
October 2, 2026
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN C. PINE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
JEAN M. KIRK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
Decided on October 2, 2026
606 CAF 25-00384
Present: Bannister, J.P., Montour, Greenwood, Nowak, And Hannah, JJ.
CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Seneca County (Barry L. Porsch, J.), entered December 19, 2024, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.
[*1]
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Pine v Kirk ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Oct. 2, 2026] [4th Dept 2026]).
Entered: October 2, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court