Back to feed Read the full judgment
IndiaCriminal
Jaswinder Singh (Dead Through Lrs.) vs State Of Punjab
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- Sep 22, 2026
- Citation
- 2026 INSC 1031
- Judges
- Ujjal Bhuyan, Arun Palli
AI breakdown
- A worker in Punjab was charged with demanding a bribe to update property records.
- The Supreme Court dismissed the charges, finding no evidence of demand or acceptance.
- Witnesses did not see the transaction; the prosecution's case was deemed insufficient.
Outcome
Consequently, the appeal is allowed.
Taken from the judgment's conclusion. Check the full text for the exact order.
Parties
Applicant
Jaswinder Singh (Dead Through Lrs.)
Respondent
State Of Punjab
Judgment text (excerpt)
Jaswinder Singh (Dead Through Lrs.) vs State Of Punjab on 22 September, 2026
2026 INSC 1031 REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2137 OF 2014
JASWINDER SINGH …APPELLANT(S)
(DEAD THROUGH LRS.)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB ....RESPONDENT(S)
JUDGMENT
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
This appeal takes exception to the judgment and
order dated 28.11.2013 passed by the High Court of Punjab and
Haryana at Chandigarh (briefly ‘the High Court’ hereinafter)
whereby the conviction and sentence of the appellant has been
affirmed.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
IRAMNAZ
Date: 2026.09.22
16:53:52 IST
2. It may be mentioned that appellant was prosecuted
Reason:
under Section 7 read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of
1
Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ‘the PC Act’ hereinafter). By the
judgment and order dated 25.02.2004 in Corruption Case No.
7 of 2002, learned Special Judge, Hoshiarpur convicted the
appellant under the aforesaid sections of the PC Act and
sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a
period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- with a
default stipulation.
3. Appellant assailed his conviction and sentence before
the High Court in Criminal Appeal No. S-596-SB of 2004. By
the impugned judgment and order dated 28.11.2013, the High
Court dismissed the appeal by affirming the conviction and
sentence.
4. This Court by order dated 30.07.2014 had issued
notice on the related special leave petition as well as on the
application for bail. On 26.09.2014, leave was granted
whereafter considering the fact that appellant was in jail for
about 7 months, he was directed to be released on bail.
…

Source: Indian Kanoon (indiankanoon.org). Indian court judgments are public records; the summary and translations are AI-generated.