Judicial Insight
Back to feed
IndiaCivil

Sanjay Prasad vs Madhusudan Dwivedi

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
Oct 14, 2026
Citation
2026 INSC 1128
Judges
Dipankar Datta

AI breakdown

  • The dispute is about whether a man can file a Special Appeal against a contempt order affecting job appointments.
  • The court decided he can file a Special Appeal within two weeks.
  • The key reason is that the man can argue jurisdiction issues in a Special Appeal.

Outcome

The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Taken from the judgment's conclusion. Check the full text for the exact order.

Parties

  • Applicant

    Sanjay Prasad

  • Respondent

    Madhusudan Dwivedi

Judgment text (excerpt)
Sanjay Prasad vs Madhusudan Dwivedi on 14 October, 2026 Author: Dipankar Datta Bench: Dipankar Datta 2026 INSC 1128 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2026 [ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33319 OF 2026] SANJAY PRASAD …APPELLANT VERSUS MADHUSUDAN DWIVEDI & ORS. …RESPONDENTS O R D E R DIPANKAR DATTA, J. 1. Although the issue under consideration has engaged the attention of this Court in the past and appears to be no longer res integra, it continues to arise with regularity and calls for further clarity and, if possible, a conclusive determination. 2. When can an order passed by a Single Judge on an application for contempt be amenable to a challenge in an intra-court appeal is the broad issue that has engaged our attention in the course of hearing of this appeal, which is directed against an interim order dated 3rd Signature Not Verified September, 20261 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court of Digitally signed by JATINDER KAUR Date: 2026.10.14 18:31:37 IST Reason: 1 impugned order 1 Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench2 in a pending application for contempt3. 3. The appeal is at the instance of the alleged contemnor before the High Court. He is aggrieved by the impugned order which, inter alia, records as follows: 7. The reasons indicated in the above referred paragraphs of order 02.09.2026 are not justified for rejecting the claim of the petitioner(s)- applicant(s). It is for the following reason(s): - (i) Wh…
Read the full judgmentpowered by IKanoon

Source: Indian Kanoon (indiankanoon.org). Indian court judgments are public records; the summary and translations are AI-generated.