Back to feed Read the full judgment
IndiaCivil
Sanjay Prasad vs Madhusudan Dwivedi
- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- Oct 14, 2026
- Citation
- 2026 INSC 1128
- Judges
- Dipankar Datta
AI breakdown
- The dispute is about whether a man can file a Special Appeal against a contempt order affecting job appointments.
- The court decided he can file a Special Appeal within two weeks.
- The key reason is that the man can argue jurisdiction issues in a Special Appeal.
Outcome
The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Taken from the judgment's conclusion. Check the full text for the exact order.
Parties
Applicant
Sanjay Prasad
Respondent
Madhusudan Dwivedi
Judgment text (excerpt)
Sanjay Prasad vs Madhusudan Dwivedi on 14 October, 2026
Author: Dipankar Datta
Bench: Dipankar Datta
2026 INSC 1128 REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2026
[ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 33319 OF 2026]
SANJAY PRASAD …APPELLANT
VERSUS
MADHUSUDAN DWIVEDI & ORS. …RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
DIPANKAR DATTA, J.
1. Although the issue under consideration has engaged the attention of this
Court in the past and appears to be no longer res integra, it continues
to arise with regularity and calls for further clarity and, if possible, a
conclusive determination.
2. When can an order passed by a Single Judge on an application for
contempt be amenable to a challenge in an intra-court appeal is the
broad issue that has engaged our attention in the course of hearing of
this appeal, which is directed against an interim order dated 3rd
Signature Not Verified
September, 20261 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court of
Digitally signed by
JATINDER KAUR
Date: 2026.10.14
18:31:37 IST
Reason:
1
impugned order
1
Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench2 in a pending application for
contempt3.
3. The appeal is at the instance of the alleged contemnor before the High
Court. He is aggrieved by the impugned order which, inter alia, records
as follows:
7. The reasons indicated in the above referred paragraphs of order
02.09.2026 are not justified for rejecting the claim of the petitioner(s)-
applicant(s). It is for the following reason(s): -
(i) Wh…

Source: Indian Kanoon (indiankanoon.org). Indian court judgments are public records; the summary and translations are AI-generated.